linux-kernel - Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:30:18 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Subject: Re:
 [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642]
 d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 January 2016 16:37:45 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > 
> > Thank you for the tips! I've updated the lists accordingly.
> > 
> > 1st priority
> > ============
> > 
> > arm-allmodconfig
> > arm-allnoconfig
> > arm-at91_dt_defconfig
> > arm-efm32_defconfig
> > arm-exynos_defconfig
> > arm-multi_v7_defconfig
> > arm-multi_v8_defconfig
> > arm-shmobile_defconfig
> > arm-sunxi_defconfig
> > 
> > 2nd priority
> > ============
> > 
> > arm-arm5
> > arm-arm67
> > arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> > arm-ixp4xx_defconfig
> > arm-mvebu_v7_defconfig
> > arm-omap2plus_defconfig
> > arm-sa1100
> > arm-samsung
> > arm-sh
> > arm-tegra_defconfig
> > 
> > 3nd priority
> > ============
> > 
> > arch/*/configs/*
> 
> Looks good, I'm just unsure about "multi_v8_defconfig", this does not
> exist. Do you mean multi_v5_defconfig?

Ah yes, multi_v8_defconfig does not exist actually.

> I also wonder if you include 'randconfig' builds for some architectures.
> I have patches for all remaining errors and warnings that I see with
> ARM randconfig builds today. Not all of them are merged yet, but I could
> probably come up with a file to be used as input to KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
> to eliminate the known-broken configurations, if you are interested.

If the are mostly ready for upstream, it may be easier to wait until
upstream randconfig works just fine for ARM.

Thanks,
Fengguang