lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160127111828.GK5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:18:28 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
> missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
> linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT
> definition was forgotten...

Opinions differ, but ultimately it's up to whoever is responsible for
accepting the patch, and in the case of ARM SoC based patches, the
arm-soc maintainers.

The arm-soc maintainers close their trees for development changes a
few weeks before hand (a patch of mine which was acked etc by 7th
December never made the 4.5 merge window either, and the alleged
reason I've been told is because arm-soc was already closed by then).

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ