lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A8C586.7070805@lightnvm.io>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:26:30 +0100
From:	Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To:	Wenwei Tao <ww.tao0320@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] lightnvm: specify target's logical address area

On 01/27/2016 01:47 PM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> 2016-01-27 17:36 GMT+08:00 Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>:
>> On 01/27/2016 07:06 AM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> 2016-01-27 13:52 GMT+08:00 Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>:
>>>> On 01/27/2016 03:21 AM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, It's a spelling mistake, will correct it in next version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can fix it in the version I apply. No problem.
>>
>> Hi Wenwei,
>>
>> I've changed it to this. Clean up the variables a bit. Is that ok with you?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> index 33224cb..27a59e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ static int nvm_core_init(struct nvm_dev *dev)
>>         dev->total_pages = dev->total_blocks * dev->pgs_per_blk;
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->online_targets);
>>         mutex_init(&dev->mlock);
>> +       spin_lock_init(&dev->lock);
>>
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c b/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c
>> index 7fb725b..6e2685d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,63 @@
>>
>>  #include "gennvm.h"
>>
>> +static int gennvm_get_area(struct nvm_dev *dev, sector_t *begin_sect,
>> +                                                       sector_t size)
>> +{
>> +       struct gen_nvm *gn = dev->mp;
>> +       struct gennvm_area *area, *prev;
>> +       int page_size = dev->sec_size * dev->sec_per_pg;
>> +       sector_t begin = 0;
>> +       sector_t max_sectors = (page_size * dev->total_pages) >> 9;
>> +
>> +       if (size > max_sectors)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       area = kmalloc(sizeof(struct gennvm_area), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!area)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock(&dev->lock);
>> +       list_for_each_entry(prev, &gn->area_list, list) {
>> +               if (begin + size > prev->begin) {
>> +                       begin = prev->end;
>> +                       continue;
>> +               }
>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if ((begin + size) > max_sectors) {
>> +               spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
>> +               kfree(area);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       area->begin = *begin_sect = begin;
>> +       area->end = begin + size;
>> +       list_add(&area->list, &prev->list);
> 
> I think I have made a mistake here. Insert the new area after prev
> will not make the list increase by area->begin. And prev is not
> trustable
> when out of the loop, it may point to list_entry((head)->next,
> typeof(*pos), member). Below is changed code:
> 
> +static int gennvm_get_area(struct nvm_dev *dev, sector_t *begin_sect,
> +                                                       sector_t size)
> +{
> +       struct gen_nvm *gn = dev->mp;
> +       struct gennvm_area *area, *prev, *next;
> +       sector_t begin = 0;
> +       int page_size = dev->sec_size * dev->sec_per_pg;
> +       sector_t max_sectors = (page_size * dev->total_pages) >> 9;
> +
> +       if (size > max_sectors)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       area = kmalloc(sizeof(struct gennvm_area), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!area)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       prev = NULL;
> +
> +       spin_lock(&dev->lock);
> +       list_for_each_entry(next, &gn->area_list, list) {
> +               if (begin + size > next->begin) {
> +                       begin = next->end;
> +                       prev = next;
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       if ((begin + size) > max_sectors) {
> +               spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
> +               kfree(area);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       area->begin = *begin_sect =  begin;
> +       area->end = begin + size;
> +       if (prev)
> +               list_add(&area->list, &prev->list);
> +       else
> +               list_add(&area->list, &gn->area_list);
> +       spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> 
> 
>> +       spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gennvm_put_area(struct nvm_dev *dev, sector_t begin)
>> +{
>> +       struct gen_nvm *gn = dev->mp;
>> +       struct gennvm_area *area;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock(&dev->lock);
>> +       list_for_each_entry(area, &gn->area_list, list) {
>> +               if (area->begin != begin)
>> +                       continue;
>> +
>> +               list_del(&area->list);
>> +               spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
>> +               kfree(area);
>> +               return;
>> +       }
>> +       spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void gennvm_blocks_free(struct nvm_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>         struct gen_nvm *gn = dev->mp;
>> @@ -230,6 +287,7 @@ static int gennvm_register(struct nvm_dev *dev)
>>
>>         gn->dev = dev;
>>         gn->nr_luns = dev->nr_luns;
>> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gn->area_list);
>>         dev->mp = gn;
>>
>>         ret = gennvm_luns_init(dev, gn);
>> @@ -466,6 +524,10 @@ static struct nvmm_type gennvm = {
>>
>>         .get_lun                = gennvm_get_lun,
>>         .lun_info_print         = gennvm_lun_info_print,
>> +
>> +       .get_area               = gennvm_get_area,
>> +       .put_area               = gennvm_put_area,
>> +
>>  };
>>
>>  static int __init gennvm_module_init(void)
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.h b/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.h
>> index 9c24b5b..04d7c23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.h
>> @@ -39,8 +39,14 @@ struct gen_nvm {
>>
>>         int nr_luns;
>>         struct gen_lun *luns;
>> +       struct list_head area_list;
>>  };
>>
>> +struct gennvm_area {
>> +       struct list_head list;
>> +       sector_t begin;
>> +       sector_t end;   /* end is excluded */
>> +};
>>  #define gennvm_for_each_lun(bm, lun, i) \
>>                 for ((i) = 0, lun = &(bm)->luns[0]; \
>>                         (i) < (bm)->nr_luns; (i)++, lun = &(bm)->luns[(i)])
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c b/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
>> index e2710da..20afe1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
>> @@ -1039,7 +1039,11 @@ static int rrpc_map_init(struct rrpc *rrpc)
>>  {
>>         struct nvm_dev *dev = rrpc->dev;
>>         sector_t i;
>> -       int ret;
>> +       u64 slba;
>> +       int ret, page_size;
>> +
>> +       page_size = dev->sec_per_pg * dev->sec_size;
>> +       slba = rrpc->soffset >> (ilog2(page_size) - 9);
>>
>>         rrpc->trans_map = vzalloc(sizeof(struct rrpc_addr) * rrpc->nr_pages);
>>         if (!rrpc->trans_map)
>> @@ -1062,8 +1066,8 @@ static int rrpc_map_init(struct rrpc *rrpc)
>>                 return 0;
>>
>>         /* Bring up the mapping table from device */
>> -       ret = dev->ops->get_l2p_tbl(dev, 0, dev->total_pages,
>> -                                                       rrpc_l2p_update, rrpc);
>> +       ret = dev->ops->get_l2p_tbl(dev, slba, rrpc->nr_pages, rrpc_l2p_update,
>> +                                                                       rrpc);
> 
> In rrpc_luns_init, rrpc->nr_pages seems to be the target's sector
> number and previously dev->total_pages is used, dev->total_pages is
> the nvm device page number, so I am a little confusing here.
> 

The dev->total pages is all pages on media. The rrpc->nr_pages is the
number of pages allocated to rrpc... which should be dev->total_pages
here, as we want to retrieve the full l2p table, and then reconstruct
the state. Thanks. Feel free to send an updated patch with the changes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ