[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8520D5D51A55D047800579B09414719825873DA8@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:33:45 +0000
From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"paul.burton@...tec.com" <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"wangyijing@...wei.com" <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"russell.joyce@...k.ac.uk" <russell.joyce@...k.ac.uk>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
"jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com" <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge
driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver
> to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
>
> On Tuesday 12 January 2016 23:06:11 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Modifying Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge Soft IP driver to work on both
> > Zynq and Microblaze Architectures.
> > With these modifications drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c, will work on
> > both Zynq and Microblaze Architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>
>
> I think this patch should be split into three, as you are doing three unrelated
> things here.
>
Agreed, will send as different patches in next series.
> > ---
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,12 @@
> > #define ECAM_DEV_NUM_SHIFT 12
> >
> > /* Number of MSI IRQs */
> > -#define XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS 128
> > +#define XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS 128
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > +#define TOT_NR_IRQS XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS
> > +#else
> > +#define TOT_NR_IRQS (NR_IRQS + XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS)
> > +#endif
>
> Something looks wrong here in the microblaze variant. What does NR_IRQS
> have to do with it?
>
> > @@ -238,15 +243,20 @@ static void xilinx_pcie_destroy_msi(unsigned int
> irq)
> > */
> > static int xilinx_pcie_assign_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) {
> > + int irq;
> > int pos;
> >
> > pos = find_first_zero_bit(msi_irq_in_use, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS);
> > - if (pos < XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS)
> > + irq = pos;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MICROBLAZE
> > + irq = XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS + pos;
> > +#endif
>
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MICROBLAZE))
> irq = XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS + pos;
>
Agreed.
> > @@ -705,7 +715,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) #endif
> > pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> > +#endif
> > pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
>
> Here it looks like microblaze gets it right. I'm not sure why we still need the
> pci_fixup_irqs() on ARM, but my feeling is that this should be fixed in
> common code.
In arm pci_fixup_irqs is called by pci_common_init_dev (arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c), since this API is removed now, I was calling it separately.
Bharat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists