[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A82331.5050403@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:53:53 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of
pr_warn()
Hello Andi,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and review.
On 01/26/2016 10:22 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
>> if (tm->tm_year < 100) {
>> - pr_warn("RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000.\n",
>> - 1900 + tm->tm_year);
>> + dev_warn(info->dev,
>> + "RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000\n",
>> + 1900 + tm->tm_year);
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> Because we are returning an error value, why not use dev_err()?
>
You are absolutely right. Since the driver was using pr_warn(), I used
dev_warn() but dev_err() would had been correct.
If you don't mind I plan to do it as a follow up patch to avoid having
to resend the whole series only for this change.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists