linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:12:14 +0900
From:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of pr_warn()

> >>  		if (tm->tm_year < 100) {
> >>-			pr_warn("RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000.\n",
> >>-				1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>+			dev_warn(info->dev,
> >>+				 "RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000\n",
> >>+				 1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>  			return -EINVAL;
> >
> >Because we are returning an error value, why not use dev_err()?
> >
> 
> You are absolutely right. Since the driver was using pr_warn(), I used
> dev_warn() but dev_err() would had been correct.
> 
> If you don't mind I plan to do it as a follow up patch to avoid having
> to resend the whole series only for this change.

Fine for me!

Andi