[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160127180822.GQ4317@lukather>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:08:22 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Add unregister function
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:52:10PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:15:40PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > sunxi's factors clk did not have an unregister function. This means
> > multiple structs were leaked whenever a factors clk was unregistered.
> >
> > Add an unregister function for it. Also keep pointers to the mux and
> > gate structs so they can be freed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> Applied, thanks!
> Maxime
So, yeah, that obviously didn't work, since clk_unregister_composite
wasn't in.
I want to give that as much linux-next coverage as possible, so I
still pulled 3, 5 and 11, replacing the call to
clk_unregister_composite by clk_unregister, adding a todo note on top.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists