| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160127180809.795068722@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:14:07 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Bridge list <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 083/127] bridge: fix lockdep addr_list_lock false positive splat
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
[ Upstream commit c6894dec8ea9ae05747124dce98b3b5c2e69b168 ]
After promisc mode management was introduced a bridge device could do
dev_set_promiscuity from its ndo_change_rx_flags() callback which in
turn can be called after the bridge's addr_list_lock has been taken
(e.g. by dev_uc_add). This causes a false positive lockdep splat because
the port interfaces' addr_list_lock is taken when br_manage_promisc()
runs after the bridge's addr list lock was already taken.
To remove the false positive introduce a custom bridge addr_list_lock
class and set it on bridge init.
A simple way to reproduce this is with the following:
$ brctl addbr br0
$ ip l add l br0 br0.100 type vlan id 100
$ ip l set br0 up
$ ip l set br0.100 up
$ echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/vlan_filtering
$ brctl addif br0 eth0
Splat:
[ 43.684325] =============================================
[ 43.684485] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 43.684636] 4.4.0-rc8+ #54 Not tainted
[ 43.684755] ---------------------------------------------
[ 43.684906] brctl/1187 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 43.685047] (_xmit_ETHER){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8150169e>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[ 43.685460] but task is already holding lock:
[ 43.685618] (_xmit_ETHER){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815072a7>] dev_uc_add+0x27/0x80
[ 43.686015] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 43.686316] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 43.686743] CPU0
[ 43.686967] ----
[ 43.687197] lock(_xmit_ETHER);
[ 43.687544] lock(_xmit_ETHER);
[ 43.687886] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 43.688438] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 43.688882] 2 locks held by brctl/1187:
[ 43.689134] #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81510317>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
[ 43.689852] #1: (_xmit_ETHER){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815072a7>] dev_uc_add+0x27/0x80
[ 43.690575] stack backtrace:
[ 43.690970] CPU: 0 PID: 1187 Comm: brctl Not tainted 4.4.0-rc8+ #54
[ 43.691270] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014
[ 43.691770] ffffffff826a25c0 ffff8800369fb8e0 ffffffff81360ceb ffffffff826a25c0
[ 43.692425] ffff8800369fb9b8 ffffffff810d0466 ffff8800369fb968 ffffffff81537139
[ 43.693071] ffff88003a08c880 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000002080020
[ 43.693709] Call Trace:
[ 43.693931] [<ffffffff81360ceb>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x70
[ 43.694199] [<ffffffff810d0466>] __lock_acquire+0x1e46/0x1e90
[ 43.694483] [<ffffffff81537139>] ? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0x139/0x3e0
[ 43.694789] [<ffffffff8153b5da>] ? nlmsg_notify+0x5a/0xc0
[ 43.695064] [<ffffffff810d10f5>] lock_acquire+0xe5/0x1f0
[ 43.695340] [<ffffffff8150169e>] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[ 43.695623] [<ffffffff815edea5>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x45/0x80
[ 43.695901] [<ffffffff8150169e>] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[ 43.696180] [<ffffffff8150169e>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[ 43.696460] [<ffffffff8150189c>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x3c/0x50
[ 43.696750] [<ffffffffa0586845>] br_port_set_promisc+0x25/0x50 [bridge]
[ 43.697052] [<ffffffffa05869aa>] br_manage_promisc+0x8a/0xe0 [bridge]
[ 43.697348] [<ffffffffa05826ee>] br_dev_change_rx_flags+0x1e/0x20 [bridge]
[ 43.697655] [<ffffffff81501532>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x132/0x1f0
[ 43.697943] [<ffffffff81501672>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x82/0x90
[ 43.698223] [<ffffffff815072de>] dev_uc_add+0x5e/0x80
[ 43.698498] [<ffffffffa05b3c62>] vlan_device_event+0x542/0x650 [8021q]
[ 43.698798] [<ffffffff8109886d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x80
[ 43.699083] [<ffffffff810988b6>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[ 43.699374] [<ffffffff814f456e>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x6e/0x80
[ 43.699678] [<ffffffff814f4596>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20
[ 43.699973] [<ffffffffa05872be>] br_add_if+0x47e/0x4c0 [bridge]
[ 43.700259] [<ffffffffa058801e>] add_del_if+0x6e/0x80 [bridge]
[ 43.700548] [<ffffffffa0588b5f>] br_dev_ioctl+0xaf/0xc0 [bridge]
[ 43.700836] [<ffffffff8151a7ac>] dev_ifsioc+0x30c/0x3c0
[ 43.701106] [<ffffffff8151aac9>] dev_ioctl+0xf9/0x6f0
[ 43.701379] [<ffffffff81254345>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x5/0x450
[ 43.701665] [<ffffffff812543ee>] ? mntput_no_expire+0xae/0x450
[ 43.701947] [<ffffffff814d7b02>] sock_do_ioctl+0x42/0x50
[ 43.702219] [<ffffffff814d8175>] sock_ioctl+0x1e5/0x290
[ 43.702500] [<ffffffff81242d0b>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2cb/0x5c0
[ 43.702771] [<ffffffff81243079>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
[ 43.703033] [<ffffffff815eebb6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: Bridge list <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Fixes: 2796d0c648c9 ("bridge: Automatically manage port promiscuous mode.")
Reported-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/bridge/br_device.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
const struct nf_br_ops __rcu *nf_br_ops __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_br_ops);
+static struct lock_class_key bridge_netdev_addr_lock_key;
+
/* net device transmit always called with BH disabled */
netdev_tx_t br_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
@@ -87,6 +89,11 @@ out:
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
+static void br_set_lockdep_class(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ lockdep_set_class(&dev->addr_list_lock, &bridge_netdev_addr_lock_key);
+}
+
static int br_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -99,6 +106,7 @@ static int br_dev_init(struct net_device
err = br_vlan_init(br);
if (err)
free_percpu(br->stats);
+ br_set_lockdep_class(dev);
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists