lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:57:51 +0530
From:	"Sricharan" <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:	"'Wolfram Sang'" <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <architt@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <ntelkar@...eaurora.org>,
	<agross@...eaurora.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	<iivanov@...sol.com>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<andy.gross@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V7 0/6] i2c: qup: Add support for v2 tags and bam dma

Hi Wolfram,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
> bounces@...ts.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Wolfram Sang
> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 5:03 PM
> To: Sricharan
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; architt@...eaurora.org; linux-arm-
> msm@...r.kernel.org; ntelkar@...eaurora.org; agross@...eaurora.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dmaengine@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> i2c@...r.kernel.org; iivanov@...sol.com; galak@...eaurora.org;
> andy.gross@...aro.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] i2c: qup: Add support for v2 tags and bam dma
> 
> > > Sricharan R (6):
> > >   i2c: qup: Change qup_wait_writeready function to use for all
timeouts
> > >   i2c: qup: Add V2 tags support
> > >   i2c: qup: Transfer each i2c_msg in i2c_msgs without a stop bit
> > >   i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities
> > >   dts: msm8974: Add blsp2_bam dma node
> > >   dts: msm8974: Add dma channels for blsp2_i2c1 node
> > >
> >  Wolfram,  Does the first 4 patches looks good to be picked up  ?
> 
> Except for patch 3 (I replied seperately), the rest looks okay to me. I
> wondered a little if it would make sense to make a new driver for v2 +
DMA,
> because the additions were quite massive. But I'll leave it up to you if
there is
> enough shared code between the two versions, so that a single driver will
be
> better.
     Hmm,  addition of V2 reused code, more than 50% addition of new loc in
this series, lot of it from DMA,
     but at this point it feels ok to have it in a single driver. 

Regards,
 Sricharan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ