linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] include/linux/list_bl.h: Use bool instead of int for boolean functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160128072236.GA5067@osiris>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 08:22:36 +0100
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/list_bl.h: Use bool instead of int for
 boolean functions

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:58:18AM +0800, chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn>
> 
> hlist_bl_unhashed() and hlist_bl_empty() are all boolean functions, so
> return bool instead of int.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/list_bl.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
> index ee7229a..cb48330 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline void INIT_HLIST_BL_NODE(struct hlist_bl_node *h)
>  
>  #define hlist_bl_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr,type,member)
>  
> -static inline int hlist_bl_unhashed(const struct hlist_bl_node *h)
> +static inline bool  hlist_bl_unhashed(const struct hlist_bl_node *h)
>  {
>  	return !h->pprev;
>  }
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_set_first(struct hlist_bl_head *h,
>  	h->first = (struct hlist_bl_node *)((unsigned long)n | LIST_BL_LOCKMASK);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int hlist_bl_empty(const struct hlist_bl_head *h)
> +static inline bool hlist_bl_empty(const struct hlist_bl_head *h)
>  {
>  	return !((unsigned long)READ_ONCE(h->first) & ~LIST_BL_LOCKMASK);

Sorry for my ignorance, but what's the point of doing conversions like
this? It has zero impact on code generation.