[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A9D123.7030601@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:28:19 +0800
From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
吴良峰 <william.wu@...k-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
"Herrero, Gregory" <gregory.herrero@...el.com>,
"Kaukab, Yousaf" <yousaf.kaukab@...el.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/21] usb: dwc2: host: Set host_rx_fifo_size to 528
for rk3066
Hi Doug,
On 01/28/2016 03:44 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> If it's all the same to you, I'll probably change it back to 525 and
> then increase the periodic FIFO size by 3 DWORDS in the next patch.
> 12 bytes may not be much, but might as well make use of them to
> improve performance / compatibility?
>
> Presumably you're also OK with the next patch in the series: ("usb:
> dwc2: host: Set host_perio_tx_fifo_size to 304 for rk3066")?
I'm OK for change in this patch, but I think we don't need next patch,
pls see the reply in another mail.
Thank,
- Kever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists