[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160128091609.GA26956@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:16:09 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Suganath prabu Subaramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@...gotech.com>
Cc: JBottomley@...allels.com, jejb@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Sathya.Prakash@...gotech.com, kashyap.desai@...gotech.com,
krishnaraddi.mankani@...gotech.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chaitra.basappa@...gotech.com, sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com
Subject: Re: [mpt3sas driver 02/10] mpt3sas: Used IEEE SGL instead of MPI SGL
while framing a SMP Passthrough request message.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:06:59PM +0530, Suganath prabu Subaramani wrote:
> From: Suganath prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@...gotech.com>
>
> As driver was using MPI SGL while framing the SMP Passthrough request
> message due to which firmware unable to post the Reply Data in the host
> memory and timeout is observed for this SMP Passthrough request message
> and so unable to perform phy disable operation.
Does this also do the right thing for MPT2 HBAs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists