[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56A96D7B.7080505@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:23:07 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on
ARMv7
On 2016년 01월 28일 09:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
> multi_v7 for ARMv7).
>
> Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v3:
> 1. Rebase on next-20160127.
>
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Follow Arnd's advice making EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK user-visible when
> COMPILE_TEST is enabled.
> 2. Dropped accumulated tags because the logic is now different.
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Use one Kconfig symbol for clocks of all ARM64 SoCs (after
> discussion): EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK.
> 2. Minor cleanups after Tomasz's comments.
> 3. Added tags: Chanwoo's, Sylwester's, Alim's and Tomasz's (the tags
> were given for v1 but assuming that change from 1. is not major
> enough to require re-tagging).
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
> index dd6093a33f84..5fd982d9f4d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -23,3 +23,8 @@ config S3C2443_COMMON_CLK
> bool "Samsung S3C2443 clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
> select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>
> +# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
> +config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
> + bool "Samsung Exynos ARMv8-family clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
> + depends on (ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG) || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> index 5f6833ea355d..fc367d4b2902 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) += clk-exynos5250.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260) += clk-exynos5260.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410) += clk-exynos5410.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420) += clk-exynos5420.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos5433.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK) += clk-exynos5433.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440) += clk-exynos5440.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos-audss.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos-clkout.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7) += clk-exynos7.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK) += clk-exynos7.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2410.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_DCLK)+= clk-s3c2410-dclk.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2412_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2412.o
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists