[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbXVLPZ_UtF9=nVxdbrp3xTEMududjXXpbF1KbRApz=1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:27:06 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> 2016-01-28 19:31 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI is more suitable than CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI
>>> to guard the drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/ directory.
>>> (I renamed CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON to CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>>
>> This patch does not apply on linux v4.5-rc1, please rebase, add
>> Maxime's ACK and resend.
>
>
> I think this patch applies on v4.5-rc1.
>
> I tried again and it succeeded.
Bah, my own fault of course.
I had other patches to Makefile etc in my tree, it was easy to fix up
so applied it now, sorry for the fuzz.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists