[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453989650.7627.30.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:00:50 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, pablo@...filter.org,
kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2] netfilter: h323: avoid potential attack
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 21:14 +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> My patch is intend to prevent kernel panic, to prevent reading garbage
> or read data from a prior frame and leak secrets, the prototypes of the
> get_h2x5_addr functions and the functions that call get_h2x5_addr should
> be changed, should we do this?
In term of security, panics are better than allowing attacker to read
data from other people, like a password.
BTW, are you able to trigger any panic ?
I am not familiar with this code, it is not obvious.
If a fix is needed, better doing it right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists