[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160128154257.GA564@swordfish>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:42:57 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@...il.com, jack@...e.cz,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peter@...leysoftware.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in
the debug code
On (01/28/16 19:53), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > ah... silly me... you mean the first CPU that triggers the spin_dump() will
> ^^^ this, of course, is true for
> console_sem->lock and logbuf_lock
> only.
>
> > deadlock itself, so the rest of CPUs will see endless recursive
> > spin_lock()->spin_dump()->spin_lock()->spin_dump() calls?
[..]
> > Can you please update your bug description in the commit message?
> > It's the deadlock that is causing the recursion on other CPUs in the
> > first place.
no, don't update anything. I was completely wrong. it's not a deadlock
that is the root cause here.
even if at some level of recursion (nested printk calls)
spin_dump()->__spin_lock_debug()->arch_spin_trylock() acquires the
lock, it returns back with the spin lock unlocked anyway.
vprintk_emit()
console_trylock()
spin_lock()
spin_dump()
vprintk_emit()
console_trylock()
spin_lock()
spin_dump()
vprintk_emit()
console_trylock()
spin_lock() << OK, got the lock finally
sem->count--
spin_unlock() << unlock, return
arch_spin_lock() << got the lock, return
sem->count--
spin_unlock() << unlock, return
arch_spin_lock() << got the lock, return
sem->count--
spin_unlock() << unlock, return
...um
> But I found there's a possiblity in the debug code *itself* to cause a
> lockup.
please explain.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists