[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160128165326.GH15948@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:53:27 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmstat: make quiet_vmstat lighter (was: Re: fast
path cycle muncher (vmstat: make vmstat_updater deferrable) again and shut
down on idle)
On Thu 28-01-16 10:40:10, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > +void quiet_vmstat(void)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we are already in hands of the shepherd then there
> > + * is nothing for us to do here.
> > + */
> > + if (cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), cpu_stat_off))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!need_update(smp_processor_id()))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> You can drop the need_update check. refresh_cpu_vm_stats() does the same
> checks in a more efficient way. If you keep this the checks will
> performed twice.
refresh_cpu_vm_stats does this_cpu_xchg for each counter. Is it really
more effective than memchr_inv?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists