[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v658SFy6SF87=obYLW1YAxvk0T4dRuBU-F1oLT3Yq=PgTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:41:33 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using
the simpler composite clk
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:15:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> sun8i-a23-mbus-clk used sunxi's factors clk, which is nice for very
>> complicated clocks, but is not really needed here.
>>
>> Convert sun8i-a23-mbus-clk to use clk_composite, as it is a gate + mux
>> + divider. This makes the code easier to understand.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> Applied, thanks!
> Maxime
Given your suggestion for extending and generalizing factors clk
clock rate calculations, maybe we just leave this one out and use
the new stuff later?
Thanks
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists