[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454013825.2576.31.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:43:45 -0700
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
micah.parrish@....com, brian.boylston@....com,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix BTT data corruptions after crash
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:12 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> > Data corruption issues were observed in tests which initiated a system
> > crash/reset while accessing BTT devices. This problem is reproducible.
> >
> > The BTT driver calls pmem_rw_bytes() to update data in pmem devices.
> > This interface calls __copy_user_nocache(), which uses non-temporal
> > stores so that the stores to pmem are persistent.
> >
> > __copy_user_nocache() uses non-temporal stores when a request size is
> > 8 bytes or larger (and is aligned by 8 bytes). The BTT driver updates
> > the BTT map table, which entry size is 4 bytes. Therefore, updates to
> > the map table entries remain cached, and are not written to pmem after
> > a crash. Since the BTT driver makes previous blocks free and uses them
> > for subsequent writes, the map table ends up pointing to blocks
> > allocated for other LBAs after a crash.
> >
> > Patch 1 extends __copy_user_nocache() to use non-temporal store for
> > 4 byte copy. This patch fixes the BTT data corruption issue.
> >
>
> Nice find!
:-)
> > Patch 2 changes arch_memcpy_to_pmem() to flush processor caches when
> > a request is not naturally aligned or is less than 4 bytes. This is
> > defensive change.
>
> I'm wondering if we should just document that this routine does not
> support unaligned transfers? Maybe backed by a debug mode that does
> the alignment check.
Yes, I agree. For this debug mode, do you have something in mind? Or
should we add a new CONFIG option like CONFIG_PMEM_DEBUG?
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists