[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1601282151440.21446@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:59:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Incorrect ordering of klp and ftrace module notifier
callbacks
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
> So it doesn't look like a simple priority tweak will work, since we want a
> ftrace->klp->klp->ftrace ordering from module load->module unload. Perhaps we
> can split the ftrace and klp notifiers into separate coming and going handlers
> with the appropriate priorities set to enforce correct ordering (not terribly
> pretty, but it works). Is there a better solution?
Given the facts that:
- we want the ordering ftrace -> klp for load and klp -> ftrace for
unload
- we already do have separate klp_module_notify_coming() and
klp_module_notify_going(), and klp_module_notify() is just a stub that
decides which one to call
I'd suggest we keep just a single ftrace_module_notify() (with INT_MIN+1,
priority), and then introduce separate notifiers
- klp_module_notify_going() with INT_MIN+2, that triggers action iff
action == MODULE_STATE_GOING
- klp_module_notify_going() with INT_MIN, that triggers action only iff
action == MODULE_STATE_COMING
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists