[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgRC2vTVdmY6kKYonM1JkWD=-3k_EQ4hGvyrm-vNZczrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:39:23 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, brijeshkumar.singh@....com,
Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, leo.duran@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] dtb: amd: Miscelleneous Updates for AMD Seattle DTS
Hi Suravee,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit
<Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>
> This patch series contains several updates for the AMD Seattle SOC DTS files.
> It also adds new board files for newer Overdrive and Linaro 96boards (Husky)
> platforms.
My Overdrive comes with DT provided by firmware, so there's no need to
have a in-kernel-tree DT source.
Are you aware of other reasons to have it here? I just foresee
divergence and conflicts between the two. It was quite obvious before
this update when the FW-provided DT was a lot more complete than what
we had in the kernel tree.
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists