lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANMBJr7iufrhqAAb85kG-Q9DKxdGWmTDSj3hH8VjvDz+2RgjKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:07:41 -0800
From:	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	박경민 <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: tegra: Set freq in rate callback

On 27 January 2016 at 20:14, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On 21 January 2016 at 02:54, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> []
>> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>> >> Reported-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
> []
>> >>
>> >
>> > I had noticed it recently but hadn't got around to look into it, thanks
>> > for fixing it.
>> >
>> > Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>
>> I don't see this patch in -next yet, so I'm guess it hasn't been
>> applied. Any chance you could pick it up? This issue is now
>> manifesting in mainline, and causing ton of noise in the boot reports.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tyler
>
>
> Hey, the patch appeared at the mailing list a week ago.
> Linux 4.5-rc1 appeared 3 days ago.
> The fastest possible for mainline inclusion is 4.5-rc2 or 3.
>
> You cannot simply expect the patch to be included in the maiinline that fast.

I agree, and I was not asking for this patch to be included into
mainline yet, just that it would be applied to maintainers tree so it
could be included in linux-next. I want to ensure this issue is not
masking other issues in linux-next.

Cheers,

Tyler

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ