[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hr3h0hul7.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:47:00 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, info@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/53] 3.10.96-stable review
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:04:19AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 53 boots: 1 failed, 52 passed (v3.10.95-53-g3ebc76ed4936)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.10.95-53-g3ebc76ed4936/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.10.95-53-g3ebc76ed4936/
>>
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-3.10.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v3.10.95-53-g3ebc76ed4936
>> Git Commit: 3ebc76ed49369086e6593e41fb7de89f4de5773a
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 27 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 16 builds out of 142
>>
>> Boot Failure Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v3.10.95-53-g3ebc76ed4936&fail
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> omap2plus_defconfig:
>> omap4-panda: 1 failed lab
>
> I'm guessing this failure is ok :)
Well, I re-tested it and it's booting fine now, so since it's a Friday
afternoon, that's good enough for me to call it "fixed."
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists