| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4043287.vvCjrxyEmh@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:59:43 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor
work items, register a utilization update callback that will be
invoked from the scheduler on utilization changes.
The sampling rate is still the same as what was used for the
deferrable timers and the added irq_work overhead should be offset by
the eliminated timers overhead, so in theory the functional impact of
this patch should not be significant.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 6 -
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 129 +++++++++++++++------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 13 ++-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 25 +++---
4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#define _CPUFREQ_GOVERNOR_H
#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -139,7 +140,9 @@ struct cpu_common_dbs_info {
struct mutex timer_mutex;
ktime_t time_stamp;
+ s64 sample_delay_ns;
atomic_t skip_work;
+ struct irq_work irq_work;
struct work_struct work;
};
@@ -155,7 +158,8 @@ struct cpu_dbs_info {
* wake-up from idle.
*/
unsigned int prev_load;
- struct timer_list timer;
+ u64 last_sample_time;
+ struct update_util_data update_util;
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared;
};
@@ -212,8 +216,7 @@ struct common_dbs_data {
struct cpu_dbs_info *(*get_cpu_cdbs)(int cpu);
void *(*get_cpu_dbs_info_s)(int cpu);
- unsigned int (*gov_dbs_timer)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- bool modify_all);
+ unsigned int (*gov_dbs_timer)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void (*gov_check_cpu)(int cpu, unsigned int load);
int (*init)(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify);
void (*exit)(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify);
@@ -270,8 +273,8 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_go
}
extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock;
-
-void gov_add_timers(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int delay);
+void gov_set_update_util(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared,
+ unsigned int delay_us);
void gov_cancel_work(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared);
void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu);
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_
* dropped down. So we perform the copy only once, upon the
* first wake-up from idle.)
*
- * Detecting this situation is easy: the governor's deferrable
- * timer would not have fired during CPU-idle periods. Hence
- * an unusually large 'wall_time' (as compared to the sampling
- * rate) indicates this scenario.
+ * Detecting this situation is easy: the governor's utilization
+ * update handler would not have run during CPU-idle periods.
+ * Hence, an unusually large 'wall_time' (as compared to the
+ * sampling rate) indicates this scenario.
*
* prev_load can be zero in two cases and we must recalculate it
* for both cases:
@@ -161,21 +161,26 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dbs_check_cpu);
-void gov_add_timers(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int delay)
+void gov_set_update_util(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared,
+ unsigned int delay_us)
{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = shared->policy;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs;
int cpu;
+ shared->sample_delay_ns = delay_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ shared->time_stamp = ktime_get();
+
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
- cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- cdbs->timer.expires = jiffies + delay;
- add_timer_on(&cdbs->timer, cpu);
+ struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+
+ cdbs->last_sample_time = 0;
+ cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu, &cdbs->update_util);
}
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gov_add_timers);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gov_set_update_util);
-static inline void gov_cancel_timers(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static inline void gov_clear_update_util_data(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs;
@@ -183,51 +188,26 @@ static inline void gov_cancel_timers(str
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(i);
- del_timer_sync(&cdbs->timer);
+ cpufreq_set_update_util_data(i, NULL);
}
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
void gov_cancel_work(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared)
{
- /* Tell dbs_timer_handler() to skip queuing up work items. */
+ /* Tell dbs_update_util_handler() to skip queuing up work items. */
atomic_inc(&shared->skip_work);
/*
- * If dbs_timer_handler() is already running, it may not notice the
- * incremented skip_work, so wait for it to complete to prevent its work
- * item from being queued up after the cancel_work_sync() below.
- */
- gov_cancel_timers(shared->policy);
- /*
- * In case dbs_timer_handler() managed to run and spawn a work item
- * before the timers have been canceled, wait for that work item to
- * complete and then cancel all of the timers set up by it. If
- * dbs_timer_handler() runs again at that point, it will see the
- * positive value of skip_work and won't spawn any more work items.
+ * If dbs_update_util_handler() is already running, it may not notice
+ * the incremented skip_work, so wait for it to complete to prevent its
+ * work item from being queued up after the cancel_work_sync() below.
*/
+ gov_clear_update_util_data(shared->policy);
cancel_work_sync(&shared->work);
- gov_cancel_timers(shared->policy);
atomic_set(&shared->skip_work, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gov_cancel_work);
-/* Will return if we need to evaluate cpu load again or not */
-static bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared,
- unsigned int sampling_rate)
-{
- if (policy_is_shared(shared->policy)) {
- ktime_t time_now = ktime_get();
- s64 delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, shared->time_stamp);
-
- /* Do nothing if we recently have sampled */
- if (delta_us < (s64)(sampling_rate / 2))
- return false;
- else
- shared->time_stamp = time_now;
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
static void dbs_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared = container_of(work, struct
@@ -235,14 +215,10 @@ static void dbs_work_handler(struct work
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
unsigned int sampling_rate, delay;
- bool eval_load;
policy = shared->policy;
dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- /* Kill all timers */
- gov_cancel_timers(policy);
-
if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
@@ -253,37 +229,53 @@ static void dbs_work_handler(struct work
sampling_rate = od_tuners->sampling_rate;
}
- eval_load = need_load_eval(shared, sampling_rate);
-
/*
- * Make sure cpufreq_governor_limits() isn't evaluating load in
+ * Make sure cpufreq_governor_limits() isn't evaluating load or the
+ * ondemand governor isn't reading the time stamp and sampling rate in
* parallel.
*/
mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
- delay = dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer(policy, eval_load);
+ delay = dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer(policy);
+ shared->sample_delay_ns = jiffies_to_nsecs(delay);
+ shared->time_stamp = ktime_get();
mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_dec(&shared->skip_work);
+}
+
+static void dbs_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+ struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared;
- gov_add_timers(policy, delay);
+ shared = container_of(irq_work, struct cpu_common_dbs_info, irq_work);
+ schedule_work(&shared->work);
}
-static void dbs_timer_handler(unsigned long data)
+static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
+ unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
{
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = (struct cpu_dbs_info *)data;
+ struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = container_of(data, struct cpu_dbs_info, update_util);
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared = cdbs->shared;
/*
- * Timer handler may not be allowed to queue the work at the moment,
- * because:
- * - Another timer handler has done that
- * - We are stopping the governor
- * - Or we are updating the sampling rate of the ondemand governor
+ * The work may not be allowed to be queued up right now.
+ * Possible reasons:
+ * - Work has already been queued up or is in progress.
+ * - The governor is being stopped.
+ * - It is too early (too little time from the previous sample).
*/
- if (atomic_inc_return(&shared->skip_work) > 1)
- atomic_dec(&shared->skip_work);
- else
- queue_work(system_wq, &shared->work);
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&shared->skip_work) == 1) {
+ u64 delta_ns;
+
+ delta_ns = time - cdbs->last_sample_time;
+ if ((s64)delta_ns >= shared->sample_delay_ns) {
+ cdbs->last_sample_time = time;
+ irq_work_queue_on(&shared->irq_work, smp_processor_id());
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ atomic_dec(&shared->skip_work);
}
static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
@@ -462,9 +454,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
io_busy = od_tuners->io_is_busy;
}
- shared->policy = policy;
- shared->time_stamp = ktime_get();
-
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j);
unsigned int prev_load;
@@ -480,10 +469,10 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
if (ignore_nice)
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
- __setup_timer(&j_cdbs->timer, dbs_timer_handler,
- (unsigned long)j_cdbs,
- TIMER_DEFERRABLE | TIMER_IRQSAFE);
+ j_cdbs->update_util.func = dbs_update_util_handler;
}
+ shared->policy = policy;
+ init_irq_work(&shared->irq_work, dbs_irq_work);
if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
@@ -500,7 +489,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
od_ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
}
- gov_add_timers(policy, delay_for_sampling_rate(sampling_rate));
+ gov_set_update_util(shared, sampling_rate);
return 0;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsign
}
}
-static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool modify_all)
+static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
@@ -200,9 +200,6 @@ static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
int delay = 0, sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
- if (!modify_all)
- goto max_delay;
-
/* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */
dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) {
@@ -218,7 +215,6 @@ static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct
}
}
-max_delay:
if (!delay)
delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners->sampling_rate
* dbs_info->rate_mult);
@@ -264,7 +260,7 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs;
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared;
- unsigned long next_sampling, appointed_at;
+ ktime_t next_sampling, appointed_at;
dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
cdbs = &dbs_info->cdbs;
@@ -292,16 +288,19 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct
continue;
/*
- * Checking this for any CPU should be fine, timers for all of
- * them are scheduled together.
+ * Checking this for any CPU sharing the policy should be fine,
+ * they are all scheduled to sample at the same time.
*/
- next_sampling = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate);
- appointed_at = dbs_info->cdbs.timer.expires;
+ next_sampling = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), new_rate);
- if (time_before(next_sampling, appointed_at)) {
- gov_cancel_work(shared);
- gov_add_timers(policy, usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate));
+ mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ appointed_at = ktime_add_ns(shared->time_stamp,
+ shared->sample_delay_ns);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ if (ktime_before(next_sampling, appointed_at)) {
+ gov_cancel_work(shared);
+ gov_set_update_util(shared, new_rate);
}
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -115,14 +115,12 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsign
}
}
-static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool modify_all)
+static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
- if (modify_all)
- dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, policy->cpu);
-
+ dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, policy->cpu);
return delay_for_sampling_rate(cs_tuners->sampling_rate);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists