linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 10/22] usb: dwc2: host: Properly set the HFIR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1454034013-24657-11-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:20:01 -0800
From:	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>, balbi@...com,
	kever.yang@...k-chips.com
Cc:	william.wu@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
	heiko@...ech.de, stefan.wahren@...e.com,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
	gregory.herrero@...el.com, yousaf.kaukab@...el.com,
	dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	ming.lei@...onical.com, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	johnyoun@...opsys.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/22] usb: dwc2: host: Properly set the HFIR

According to the most up to date version of the dwc2 databook, the FRINT
field of the HFIR register should be programmed to:
* 125 us * (PHY clock freq for HS) - 1
* 1000 us * (PHY clock freq for FS/LS) - 1

This is opposed to older versions of the doc that claimed it should be:
* 125 us * (PHY clock freq for HS)
* 1000 us * (PHY clock freq for FS/LS)

In case you didn't spot it, the difference is the "- 1".

Let's add the "- 1" to match the newest user manual.  It's presumed that
the "- 1" should have always been there and that this was always a
documentation error.  If some hardware needs the "- 1" and other
hardware doesn't, we'll have to add a configuration parameter for it in
the future.

I checked things before and after this patch on rk3288 using a Total
Phase Beagle 5000 analyzer.

Before this patch, a low speed mouse shows constant Frame Timing Jitter
errors.  After this patch errors have gone away.

Before this patch SOF packets move forward about 1 us per 4 ms.  After
this patch the SOF packets move backward about 1 us per 255 ms.  Some
specific SOF timestamps from the analyzer are below.

Before:
  6.603.790
  6.603.916
  6.604.041
  6.604.166
  ...
  6.607.541
  6.607.667
  6.607.792
  6.607.917
  ...
  6.611.417
  6.611.543
  6.611.668
  6.611.793

After:
  6.215.159
  6.215.284
  6.215.408
  6.215.533
  6.215.658
  ...
  6.470.658
  6.470.783
  6.470.907
  ...
  6.726.032
  6.726.157
  6.725.281
  6.725.406

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
---
Changes in v6:
- Incorporated Properly set the HFIR patch to big series in v6
- Add Heiko's Tested-by.

Changes in v5: None
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

 drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c
index ed73b26818c0..a5db20f12ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c
@@ -2245,10 +2245,10 @@ u32 dwc2_calc_frame_interval(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
 
 	if ((hprt0 & HPRT0_SPD_MASK) >> HPRT0_SPD_SHIFT == HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED)
 		/* High speed case */
-		return 125 * clock;
+		return 125 * clock - 1;
 	else
 		/* FS/LS case */
-		return 1000 * clock;
+		return 1000 * clock - 1;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.0.rc3.207.g0ac5344