[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AADA02.9040900@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:18:26 +1000
From: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>
To: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Taesoo Kim <taesoo@...ech.edu>,
Yeongjin Jang <yeongjin.jang@...ech.edu>,
"Yun, Insu" <insu@...ech.edu>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...ech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau: need to handle failed allocation
On 01/29/2016 10:12 AM, Insu Yun wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu
> <mailto:imirkin@...m.mit.edu>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com
> <mailto:wuninsu@...il.com>> wrote:
> > drm_property_create_range can be failed in memory pressure.
> > So, it needs to be handled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com <mailto:wuninsu@...il.com>>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > index 24be27d..26b4902 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > @@ -443,6 +443,12 @@ nouveau_display_create_properties(struct drm_device *dev)
> > /* -100..+100 */
> > disp->color_vibrance_property =
> > drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "color vibrance", 0, 200);
> > +
> > + if (!disp->underscan_hborder_property ||
> > + !disp->underscan_vborder_property ||
> > + !disp->vibrant_hue_property ||
> > + !disp->color_vibrance_property)
> > + return;
>
> Aren't we at the end of the function anyways?
>
>
> Sorry. it is not perfect patch
> I found this by my static analyzer.
> I have limited knowledge about this driver.
> I don't want to mass up your driver.
> What I want to do is to tell you there is a bug.
> I think we need to return error to caller.
I'm not so sure we do. We check for valid pointers for these when
they're actually used, so no OOPS will occur. Worst case, the driver
still loads correctly with some missing properties.
Ben.
>
>
>
> > }
> >
> > int
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Insu Yun
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists