[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160129055553.GB8867@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:55:53 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com, info@...nelci.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/53] 3.10.96-stable review
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:59:47PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 10:15 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >-------------------------
> >NOTE:
> > There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well
> > over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches
> > might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig
> > out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific
> > patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon,
> > please let me know.
> >-------------------------
> >
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.96 release.
> >There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:06:17 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Build results:
> total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists