[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F00C2E3D72@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:56 +0000
From: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver
lowest-priority interrupts
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paolo Bonzini
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 4:18 PM
> To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@...el.com>; Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-
> priority interrupts
>
> >>> +module_param(vector_hashing, bool, S_IRUGO);
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your comments, Radim & Paolo!
> >
> > Paolo, given that the only two comments above, do I need to send v5? Or
> > you can handle it while merging them? I am fine with both methods.
>
> It's fine, I'm merging it.
Thanks a lot, Paolo.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists