[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160129202440.GB4534@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:24:40 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Milburn <dmilburn@...hat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: ata: BUG in ata_sff_hsm_move
Hello, David.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:14:42PM -0600, David Milburn wrote:
> Can ata_sff_hsm_move grab the lock and save off the task_state,
> like this patch?
It's not just the task_state. Everything the polling path is doing is
dangerous. It's all pretty confused.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists