[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160130213003.GA13560@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:30:03 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Weidong Wang <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: nf_conntrack: remove the unneed
check for *bucket
Weidong Wang <wangweidong1@...wei.com> wrote:
> In the 'for(...) {}', the *bucket alwasy < net->ct.htable_size,
> so remove the check
> @@ -1383,14 +1383,12 @@ get_next_corpse(struct net *net, int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data),
> lockp = &nf_conntrack_locks[*bucket % CONNTRACK_LOCKS];
> local_bh_disable();
> spin_lock(lockp);
> - if (*bucket < net->ct.htable_size) {
AFAIU net->ct.htable_size can shrink between for-test and aquiring
the bucket lockp, so this additional if-test is needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists