[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AC0F74.2040808@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:18:44 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list
is not NULL.
On 2016/1/29 17:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:03:50PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>
>> looks good to me, I will try this solution and report the result, thanks everyone.
>
> Did you get a change to run with this?
>
> .
>
I backport this patch to 3.10 lts kernel, and didn't change any logic, Till now, the patch works fine to me, and no need to change anything,
So I think this patch is no problem, could you formal release this patch to the latest kernel? :)
Thanks.
Ding
Powered by blists - more mailing lists