linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:38:10 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alior@...vell.com,
	nadavh@...vell.com, mw@...ihalf.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	w@....eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu_elect function
 should be atomic

From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:26:06 +0100

> @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ struct mvneta_port {
>  	struct net_device *dev;
>  	struct notifier_block cpu_notifier;
>  	int rxq_def;
> +	/* protect  */
> +	spinlock_t lock;
>  
>  	/* Core clock */
>  	struct clk *clk;

Protect what?  This comment needs a lot of improvement.

Everyone knows a spinlock "protects" things, so if you aren't going
to actually describe what this lock protects, and in what contexts
the lock is used, you might as well not say anything at all.