| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:29:26 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> To: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] rtc: enable adjustment of clock offset Hi, On 26/01/2016 at 17:00:31 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > On 26/01/2016 at 06:56:40 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote : > > Ping? > > > > On Monday, January 04, 2016 10:31:18 AM Joshua Clayton wrote: > > > Alexandre, > > > this is the second version of apatch set to be able to adjust the > > > clock on a pcf2123, but with a big addition. I am also proposing > > > a couple of new rtc api functions and a new sysfs file. > > > > > > Patches 1-5 are very much v2 patches that address All of the > > > concerns you had with v1. It is my hope to get them merged without > > > too much more trouble. > > > > > The rtc _needs_ patches 1-5 in order to use the clock offset > > adjustment at all (current upstream code resets it to zero during > > device probe, so it doesn't survive a reboot) > > Should I split out patches 1-5 to make them easier to review? > > > > The merge widows just closed so I've started to collect a few patches > since monday. This is a big series and I didn't have time to review > everything yet. > Patches 1-5 are applied and pushed to rtc-next. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists