[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160131112926.GH20165@piout.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:29:26 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] rtc: enable adjustment of clock offset
Hi,
On 26/01/2016 at 17:00:31 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> On 26/01/2016 at 06:56:40 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote :
> > Ping?
> >
> > On Monday, January 04, 2016 10:31:18 AM Joshua Clayton wrote:
> > > Alexandre,
> > > this is the second version of apatch set to be able to adjust the
> > > clock on a pcf2123, but with a big addition. I am also proposing
> > > a couple of new rtc api functions and a new sysfs file.
> > >
> > > Patches 1-5 are very much v2 patches that address All of the
> > > concerns you had with v1. It is my hope to get them merged without
> > > too much more trouble.
> > >
> > The rtc _needs_ patches 1-5 in order to use the clock offset
> > adjustment at all (current upstream code resets it to zero during
> > device probe, so it doesn't survive a reboot)
> > Should I split out patches 1-5 to make them easier to review?
> >
>
> The merge widows just closed so I've started to collect a few patches
> since monday. This is a big series and I didn't have time to review
> everything yet.
>
Patches 1-5 are applied and pushed to rtc-next.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists