[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:02:39 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, swarren@...dia.com, treding@...dia.com,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com, vreddytalla@...dia.com,
Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for
MAX77620/MAX20024
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >
> >>This depends on patch
> >>[PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells
> >>
> >>and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error.
> >If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set?
> >
>
> This change is not related to the series as such and so independent.
> I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May
> be I missed some points here.
If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so
independent, right?
> Let me know if I need to add this to back on series.
In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists