linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mcheck/therm_throt: Replace printk(KERN_XX...) with pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160201093809.GA6438@pd.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:38:09 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>, hpa@...or.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mcheck/therm_throt: Replace printk(KERN_XX...) with
 pr_xx(...)

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:24:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So there are 37,000+ printk() calls in the kernel and 900+ ones in arch/x86/ 
> > alone! Plus even after this patch there's 20 more printk()s left in 
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/...
> > 
> > We don't want to create a churn of 10,000+ commits to convert them to pr_*() 
> > facilities...
> > 
> > So we don't apply such 'conversion' patches unless it's done for a whole subsystem 
> > and done as part of a larger work with good reason, or if it's done as part of 
> > completely new facilities/drivers - and is done consistently.
> > 
> > Even then it's dubious to convert: people keep re-adding printk()s (which is a 
> > perfectly fine facility), which generates never ending churn ...

Amen to that!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.