[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160201095357.GO6719@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:53:57 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:55:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18:0,
> from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
> from /home/sfr/next/next/kernel/rcu/tree.c:33:
> /home/sfr/next/next/kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'rcu_init_one':
> /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/lockdep.h:299:27: error: 'struct rt_mutex' has no member named 'dep_map'
> lockdep_init_map(&(lock)->dep_map, name, key, 0)
> ^
> /home/sfr/next/next/kernel/rcu/tree.c:4572:4: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_set_class_and_name'
> lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
> ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 725b7f3805c6 ("rcu: Convert expedited grace-period funnel lock to rt_mutex")
>
> I have used the rcu tree from next-20160129 for today.
Apologies, that was too experimental for -next. I have placed rcu/next
to precede the offending commit.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists