lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AF4911.8030208@citrix.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:01:21 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen/PCI: correct notifier used for device removal

On 01/02/16 11:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit 599bad38cf added BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE in order to allow
> avoiding removal of IOMMU mappings before the driver actually got
> unbound from the device. Naturally we should be using this too.

Because otherwise...?  What happens if we don't make this change?

Removing IOMMU mappings for a device when the driver is still bound to
the device looks wrong to me. Surely the device is still active and may
still be performing DMA at this point?

David

> --- 4.5-rc2/drivers/xen/pci.c
> +++ 4.5-rc2-xen-PCI-remove-notifier/drivers/xen/pci.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int xen_pci_notifier(struct notif
>  	case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
>  		r = xen_add_device(dev);
>  		break;
> -	case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE:
>  		r = xen_remove_device(dev);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ