[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AF4911.8030208@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:01:21 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen/PCI: correct notifier used for device removal
On 01/02/16 11:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit 599bad38cf added BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE in order to allow
> avoiding removal of IOMMU mappings before the driver actually got
> unbound from the device. Naturally we should be using this too.
Because otherwise...? What happens if we don't make this change?
Removing IOMMU mappings for a device when the driver is still bound to
the device looks wrong to me. Surely the device is still active and may
still be performing DMA at this point?
David
> --- 4.5-rc2/drivers/xen/pci.c
> +++ 4.5-rc2-xen-PCI-remove-notifier/drivers/xen/pci.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int xen_pci_notifier(struct notif
> case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
> r = xen_add_device(dev);
> break;
> - case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
> + case BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE:
> r = xen_remove_device(dev);
> break;
> default:
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists