[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160201133437.GD10764@red-moon>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:34:37 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:36:57PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >index 3cd6983..e20dbe5 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >@@ -275,11 +275,14 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> > * to access PCI configuration space.
> > *
> > * So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF].
> >+ *
> >+ * Furthermore, IO ports address space is limited to 16k on x86,
>
> Minor typo for '16k', should be '64k'? or we can just specify
> the magic number 0x10003?
Thanks, I will fix it, it is a leftover.
> By the way, I tested this patch both on x86 and ia64 box,
> and PCI for both box is working properly after boot,
>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Thank you very much !
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists