[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AF5EB8.8010407@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:33:44 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu_elect function
should be atomic
On 2/1/2016 4:07 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Electing a CPU must be done in an atomic way: it should be done after or
> before the removal/insertion of a CPU and this function is not reentrant.
>
> During the loop of mvneta_percpu_elect we associates the queues to the
> CPUs, if there is a topology change during this loop, then the mapping
> between the CPUs and the queues could be wrong. During this loop the
> interrupt mask is also updating for each CPUs, It should not be changed
> in the same time by other part of the driver.
>
> This patch adds spinlock to create the needed critical sections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 1ed813d478e8..4d40d2fde7ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
[...]
> @@ -2855,6 +2859,11 @@ static void mvneta_percpu_elect(struct mvneta_port *pp)
> {
> int online_cpu_idx, max_cpu, cpu, i = 0;
>
> + /* Electing a CPU must done in an atomic way: it should be
Must be done.
> + * done after or before the removal/insertion of a CPU and
> + * this function is not reentrant.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&pp->lock);
> online_cpu_idx = pp->rxq_def % num_online_cpus();
> max_cpu = num_present_cpus();
>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists