[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160201141424.GA1448@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:14:24 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: ignore lower entries when checking purity of
non-directory entries
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 04:17:53PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> After rename file dentry still holds reference to lower dentry from
> previous location. This doesn't matter for data access because data
> cames from upper dentry. But this stale lower dentry taints dentry
> at new location and turns it into non-pure upper. Such file leaves
> visible whiteout entry after remove in directory which shouldn't
> have whiteouts at all.
>
> Overlayfs already tracks pureness of file location in oe->opaque.
> This patch just uses that for detecting actual path type.
>
> Comment from Vivek Goyal's patch:
>
> Here are the details of the problem. Do following.
>
> $ mkdir upper lower work merged upper/dir/
> $ touch lower/test
> $ sudo mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=lower,upperdir=upper,workdir=work
> merged
> $ mv merged/test merged/dir/
> $ rm merged/dir/test
> $ ls -l merged/dir/
> /usr/bin/ls: cannot access merged/dir/test: No such file or directory
> total 0
> c????????? ? ? ? ? ? test
>
> Basic problem seems to be that once a file has been unlinked, a
> whiteout has been left behind which was not needed and hence it becomes
> visible.
>
> whiteout is visible because parent dir is of not type MERGE, hence
> od->is_real is set during ovl_dir_open(). And that means ovl_iterate()
> passes on iterate handling directly to underlying fs. Underlying fs does
> not know/filter whiteouts so it becomes visible to user.
>
> Why did we leave a whiteout to begin with when we should not have.
> ovl_do_remove() checks for OVL_TYPE_PURE_UPPER() and does not leave
> whiteout if file is pure upper. In this case file is not found to be
> pure upper hence whiteout is left.
>
> So why file was not PURE_UPPER in this case? I think because dentry is
> still carrying some leftover state which was valid before rename. For example,
> od->numlower was set to 1 as it was a lower file. After rename, this state
> is not valid anymore as there is no such file in lower.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Viktor Stanchev <me@...torstanchev.com>
> Diagnosed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109611
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for the patch. This patch works for me also does not break
unionmount-testsuite.
This change also sounds reasonable to me. (given we can't free lower). So
over rename we will be keeping references to dentries which we should
not have to. I guess there does not seem to be a better option.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Thanks
Vivek
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 7 +++++++
> fs/overlayfs/super.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> index ed95272d57a6..edf83f325bca 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,13 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *olddir, struct dentry *old,
> if (!overwrite && new_is_dir && !old_opaque && new_opaque)
> ovl_remove_opaque(newdentry);
>
> + /*
> + * Old dentry now lives in different location. Dentries in
> + * lowerstack are stale. We cannot drop them here because
> + * access to them is lockless. This could be only pure upper
> + * or opaque directory - numlower is zero. Or upper non-dir
> + * entry - its pureness is tracked by flag opaque.
> + */
> if (old_opaque != new_opaque) {
> ovl_dentry_set_opaque(old, new_opaque);
> if (!overwrite)
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> index 8d826bd56b26..ba28b007005e 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> @@ -76,12 +76,14 @@ enum ovl_path_type ovl_path_type(struct dentry *dentry)
> if (oe->__upperdentry) {
> type = __OVL_PATH_UPPER;
>
> - if (oe->numlower) {
> - if (S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> - type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE;
> - } else if (!oe->opaque) {
> + /*
> + * Non-dir dentry can hold lower dentry from previous
> + * location. Its purity depends only on opaque flag.
> + */
> + if (oe->numlower && S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> + type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE;
> + else if (!oe->opaque)
> type |= __OVL_PATH_PURE;
> - }
> } else {
> if (oe->numlower > 1)
> type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists