linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1454295246.22151.6.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:54:06 +0800
From:	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
To:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC:	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 15:29 +0800, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Eduardo,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:19:40PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> > 
> > > 
> > > That should remove the policy of computing the maximum from this driver.
> > > Please have a look on the work being done [1] to add grouping and
> > > aggregation of thermal zones. With that in place, you should be a matter
> > > of configuring the grouping and selecting max as the aggregation function,
> > > from the thermal core, instead in the driver. Which should give the
> > > system engineer, more flexibility to compose whatever policy based on
> > > the exposed sensors.
> > 
> > I think the aggregation of thermal zones is quite useful when it comes
> > to putting different chips together to a system. I am not so sure how
> > useful it is to expose different thermal zones of a single SoC to the
> > device tree.
> > Currently the only control knob we have is the CPU frequency. When any
> > of the sensors on the SoC gets too hot then the only thing we can do is
> > to decrease the CPU frequency. This does not leave much space for
> > configuration in the device tree.
> > What I need to be able is to attach multiple sensors to one thermal
> > zone. The aggregation patch series only partly solves that and I think
> > is inconsistent, but I commented on the series directly.
> 
> Any input on this? I really like to get this driver upstream as it is
> currently blocking other Mediatek drivers.
> 

Hi Eduardo,

Do you have any comment about Sascha's response ? We really hope get
your comment since Mediatek thermal driver already reviewed in public
over half years, and we have other patches [0] [1] depend on thermal
driver.

[0]:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/394084.html
[1]:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401055.html

Regards,
Eddie