[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3477441.9K8aQAEjZq@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:23:39 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@...cle.com>,
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unused label
A recent cleanup modified the ocfs2_file_write_iter function, which
no longer uses its 'relock' label, as gcc warns:
fs/ocfs2/file.c: In function 'ocfs2_file_write_iter':
fs/ocfs2/file.c:2198:1: error: label 'relock' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]
This removes the label as well.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 1a46f12e5071 ("ocfs2: code clean up for direct io")
---
Found on ARM randconfig builds on linux-next last week.
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
index 41c506e7814e..c18ab45f8d21 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -2195,7 +2195,6 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
inode_lock(inode);
-relock:
/*
* Concurrent O_DIRECT writes are allowed with
* mount_option "coherency=buffered".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists