linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:39 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com, clark@...hat.com,
	luto@...capital.net, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call
 account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy

On 02/01/2016 03:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:21 -0500, riel@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>>
> 
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>> +static bool vtime_jiffies_changed(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long now)
>> +{
>> +	if (tsk->vtime_jiffies == jiffies)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	tsk->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
>> +	return true;
>> +}
> 
> I am guessing you intended to use 'now' instead of jiffies ?

Yes indeed. Good catch.

I have fixed this up in my local tree, and will wait for
more people's comments before sending out a v5 (tomorrow?).

-- 
All rights reversed