[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160201202458.GJ4652@lukather>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:24:58 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using
the simpler composite clk
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:41:33AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:15:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> sun8i-a23-mbus-clk used sunxi's factors clk, which is nice for very
> >> complicated clocks, but is not really needed here.
> >>
> >> Convert sun8i-a23-mbus-clk to use clk_composite, as it is a gate + mux
> >> + divider. This makes the code easier to understand.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> > Maxime
>
> Given your suggestion for extending and generalizing factors clk
> clock rate calculations, maybe we just leave this one out and use
> the new stuff later?
My suggestion was only about the core of the clk-factors, the
"external" API would not change, so I'm guessing it's still relevant.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists