[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454366879.21738.29.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:47:59 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Remove unnecessary numa dequeue update from non-SMP
kernel
In account_entity_enqueue, we do not do account_numa_enqueue
as NUMA balancing is not needed for non-SMP configured kernel.
Hence, we should remove account_numa_dequeue from
account_entity_dequeue for the non-SMP kernel.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 56b7d4b..6cbe2fb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2405,10 +2405,12 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
if (!parent_entity(se))
update_load_sub(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (entity_is_task(se)) {
account_numa_dequeue(rq_of(cfs_rq), task_of(se));
list_del_init(&se->group_node);
}
+#endif
cfs_rq->nr_running--;
}
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists