linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 00/26] perf tools: Introduce hists specific format entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:42:16 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/26] perf tools: Introduce hists specific format entries

Em Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:22:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Ok, so I rebased it on top of my perf/core branch, adjusting some stuff
> wrt recent patchkits from Namhyung (hist_entry__callchain_fprintf() is
> no more, etc), and renaming that perf_hpp_list->{list,sort_list} to
> ->{fields,sorts} as Namhyung suggested and you agreed, it builds...
> 
> But perf top isn't showing the overhead column... there were some
> changes to perf report in this patchkit to move some initializations...
> will check there...

Fixed, doing the same change you made for 'perf report', moving the
setup_sorting call to after the setup_browser one, inserted a new patch
with that just before the patch where the problem was bisected, please
check.

To recap:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list&id=7d105448f8922679956728a7f5106218378c450e

- Arnaldo