lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:25:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, mhocko@...e.cz,
	gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: Re: GPF in shm_lock ipc

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:44:34 +0100 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > What about this:
> 
> 
> Ping. This is still happening for me on tip. Can we pull in this fix
> if it looks good to everybody?
> 

Well we have at least three patches to choose from in this thread, most
of them missing most signs of having been reviewed or tested.

So I grabbed the last one, below.  Can we please rev this up again,
test it, see if we can agree that this is the way to go forward?

Thanks.



From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap()

remap_file_pages(2) emulation can reach file which represents removed IPC
ID as long as a memory segment is mapped.  It breaks expectations of IPC
subsystem.

Test case (rewritten to be more human readable, originally autogenerated
by syzkaller[1]):

	#define _GNU_SOURCE
	#include <stdlib.h>
	#include <sys/ipc.h>
	#include <sys/mman.h>
	#include <sys/shm.h>

	#define PAGE_SIZE 4096

	int main()
	{
		int id;
		void *p;

		id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 3 * PAGE_SIZE, 0);
		p = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
		shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
		remap_file_pages(p, 3 * PAGE_SIZE, 0, 7, 0);

	        return 0;
	}

The patch changes shm_mmap() and code around shm_lock() to propagate
locking error back to caller of shm_mmap().

[1] http://github.com/google/syzkaller

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 ipc/shm.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff -puN ipc/shm.c~gpf-in-shm_lock-ipc ipc/shm.c
--- a/ipc/shm.c~gpf-in-shm_lock-ipc
+++ a/ipc/shm.c
@@ -156,11 +156,12 @@ static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_l
 	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock(&shm_ids(ns), id);
 
 	/*
-	 * We raced in the idr lookup or with shm_destroy().  Either way, the
-	 * ID is busted.
+	 * Callers of shm_lock() must validate the status of the returned ipc
+	 * object pointer (as returned by ipc_lock()), and error out as
+	 * appropriate.
 	 */
-	WARN_ON(IS_ERR(ipcp));
-
+	if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
+		return (void *)ipcp;
 	return container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
 }
 
@@ -186,18 +187,33 @@ static inline void shm_rmid(struct ipc_n
 }
 
 
-/* This is called by fork, once for every shm attach. */
-static void shm_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static int __shm_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
 	struct shm_file_data *sfd = shm_file_data(file);
 	struct shmid_kernel *shp;
 
 	shp = shm_lock(sfd->ns, sfd->id);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(shp))
+		return PTR_ERR(shp);
+
 	shp->shm_atim = get_seconds();
 	shp->shm_lprid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	shp->shm_nattch++;
 	shm_unlock(shp);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* This is called by fork, once for every shm attach. */
+static void shm_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	int err = __shm_open(vma);
+	/*
+	 * We raced in the idr lookup or with shm_destroy().
+	 * Either way, the ID is busted.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -260,6 +276,14 @@ static void shm_close(struct vm_area_str
 	down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rwsem);
 	/* remove from the list of attaches of the shm segment */
 	shp = shm_lock(ns, sfd->id);
+
+	/*
+	 * We raced in the idr lookup or with shm_destroy().
+	 * Either way, the ID is busted.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(shp)))
+		goto done; /* no-op */
+
 	shp->shm_lprid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	shp->shm_dtim = get_seconds();
 	shp->shm_nattch--;
@@ -267,6 +291,7 @@ static void shm_close(struct vm_area_str
 		shm_destroy(ns, shp);
 	else
 		shm_unlock(shp);
+done:
 	up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rwsem);
 }
 
@@ -388,17 +413,25 @@ static int shm_mmap(struct file *file, s
 	struct shm_file_data *sfd = shm_file_data(file);
 	int ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * In case of remap_file_pages() emulation, the file can represent
+	 * removed IPC ID: propogate shm_lock() error to caller.
+	 */
+	ret =__shm_open(vma);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	ret = sfd->file->f_op->mmap(sfd->file, vma);
-	if (ret != 0)
+	if (ret) {
+		shm_close(vma);
 		return ret;
+	}
 	sfd->vm_ops = vma->vm_ops;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 	WARN_ON(!sfd->vm_ops->fault);
 #endif
 	vma->vm_ops = &shm_vm_ops;
-	shm_open(vma);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int shm_release(struct inode *ino, struct file *file)
_

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ