lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:06:02 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, dietmar.eggemann@....com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor On 01-02-16, 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "the sysfs lock" here? The policy rwsem > or something else? He perhaps referred to the s_active.lock that we see in traces. -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists