[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:50:03 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
liguo zhang <liguo.zhang@...iatek.com>
Cc: srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Xudong Chen <xudong.chen@...iatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Document: i2c: Add a dt binding for mediatek MT2701
soc
On 08/01/16 08:45, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:12:53AM +0800, liguo zhang wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 10:55 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:15:37PM +0800, Liguo Zhang wrote:
>>>> Add a dt binding for the MT2701 soc.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Liguo Zhang <liguo.zhang@...iatek.com>
>>>
>>> This should probably go with the other patch via arm-soc, or?
>>
>> The patch about i2c dts info for MT2701 depends on the MT2701 clock
>> patch. After the MT2701 clock patch is accepted, the i2c patch for
>> MT2701 may be accepted.
>
> OK. Still, dts changes go via arm-soc 99% of the cases if there is no
> specific need to go via i2c.
>
No specific need here. I will take it through my branch as soon as the
clock driver is accepted.
Liguo, please poke me on this, when this has happened and you have the
feeling, I forgot about.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists