lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:44:24 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: mod_delayed_work()  explosion due to  874bbfe6

Hi Tejun,

I'm looking at a crash analysis that fingers 874bbfe6 as being the
culprit.  (I didn't do the analysis, but it appears to be correct)

Scenario: CPU168 calls mod_delayed_work(), is taken offline before the
timer expires.  Due to 874bbfe6, dwork->cpu is the now offline CPU168
vs the previous WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, timer fires on CPU131, it tries to
__queue_work() with cpu == the now offline CPU168, gets to...

        } else
                pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));

... and goes boom.

<snippet>
crash> p numa_node | grep 168
  [168]: ffff8c03fdf0e328
crash> rd ffff8c03fdf0e328
ffff8c03fdf0e328:  00000000ffffffff                    ........

Thus, pwq becomes 000000000. Then, as the result of reference to
pwq->pool, NULL reference occurs at (*PANIC).
</snippet>

What if anything is supposed to prevent this?

	-Mike

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ